Opinion, Judge Sykes, p 14-15: "When a district judge takes sides in a religious schism, purports to decide matters of spiritual succession, and excludes dissenters from using the name, symbols, and marks of the faith (as distinct from the name and marks of a church), the First Amendment line appears to have been crossed". US 7th Circuit Court of Appeals, Case No. 08-2306. Baha'i Faith vs other Bahai denominations. November 23, 2010
Sunday, May 1, 2011
Personal Reflections on the Baha'i lawsuits
The lawyer that represented the Orthodox Baha'i Faith before Judge St. Eve has just posted an insightful reflection on the implications of the US Federal Courts ruling. I share it here for those who might find it interesting and informative about how the Wilmette-Haifan Baha'i Faith actually behaves behind the backs of its largely innocent and gullible followers, deceived and brainwashed into despising and violating the principles of the US Constitution:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment